r-studio version 1.4 Search Results


randomforest r-package version 4.6-14  (RStudio)
90
RStudio randomforest r-package version 4.6-14
Structural differences between V L κ and V L λ were determined by <t>RandomForest.</t> (A) The most reliable classifiers for assigning the dataset of full light chain structures to the κ and λ isotypes are identified by the mean decrease gini (variables defined in ). (B) Unknown sequences can be reliably assigned to the κ and λ isotype according to the length of LFR4. (C) An overlay of representative Cα-traces displays how the exclusion (V L κ, green, 5ifa ( Huang et al ., 2004 )) or incorporation (V L λ, red, 3ujj ( Guan et al ., 2013 )) of L106A in LFR4 affects the structure. (D) V L λ structures exhibited a significantly lower energy penalty for peptide bonds in the cis-conformation if compared to V L κ structures. (E) The number of residues in LFR1 enables to distinguish between V L κ and V L λ sequences. (F) Representative structures of V L λ (3ujj ( Gorny et al ., 2011 ), red) and V L κ (5ifa ( Jardine et al ., 2016 ), green) illustrate structural differences in LFR1. V L κ structures frequently contain a cis-proline at position L8, stabilizing a fold that dramatically differs from V L λ structures that favor trans-prolines at positions L7 and L8. (G) ‘ Sequence logo’ representation of the amino acids identities in LFR1 of V L κ (top) and V L λ (bottom). (H, I) Representative structures of V L κ (H , green, PDBs: 3drq ( Julien et al ., 2008 ), 4ygv ( Schiele et al ., 2015 ), 4jm4 ( Kong et al ., 2013 ) and 4zyk ( Gilman et al ., 2015 )) and V L λ ( I , red, PDBs: 4h8w ( Acharya et al ., 2014 ), 1aqk ( Faber et al ., 1998 ), 5d7s ( Eylenstein et al ., 2016 ), 5cck ( Lee et al ., 2015 )) clearly differ in the conserved environment of residue L95. Yellow cylinders, hydrogen bonds; yellow and orange structure, heavy chain; cyan residue, Gln L90; magenta, Pro L95; orange, Thr L97; blue, Phe L98; green, Val L97. (J) ‘ Sequence logo’ representation of the amino acids occurrence spatially neighboring residues of L95 in V L κ (top) and V L λ (bottom).
Randomforest R Package Version 4.6 14, supplied by RStudio, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/randomforest r-package version 4.6-14/product/RStudio
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
randomforest r-package version 4.6-14 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
r studio version 14.2  (RStudio)
90
RStudio r studio version 14.2
Structural differences between V L κ and V L λ were determined by <t>RandomForest.</t> (A) The most reliable classifiers for assigning the dataset of full light chain structures to the κ and λ isotypes are identified by the mean decrease gini (variables defined in ). (B) Unknown sequences can be reliably assigned to the κ and λ isotype according to the length of LFR4. (C) An overlay of representative Cα-traces displays how the exclusion (V L κ, green, 5ifa ( Huang et al ., 2004 )) or incorporation (V L λ, red, 3ujj ( Guan et al ., 2013 )) of L106A in LFR4 affects the structure. (D) V L λ structures exhibited a significantly lower energy penalty for peptide bonds in the cis-conformation if compared to V L κ structures. (E) The number of residues in LFR1 enables to distinguish between V L κ and V L λ sequences. (F) Representative structures of V L λ (3ujj ( Gorny et al ., 2011 ), red) and V L κ (5ifa ( Jardine et al ., 2016 ), green) illustrate structural differences in LFR1. V L κ structures frequently contain a cis-proline at position L8, stabilizing a fold that dramatically differs from V L λ structures that favor trans-prolines at positions L7 and L8. (G) ‘ Sequence logo’ representation of the amino acids identities in LFR1 of V L κ (top) and V L λ (bottom). (H, I) Representative structures of V L κ (H , green, PDBs: 3drq ( Julien et al ., 2008 ), 4ygv ( Schiele et al ., 2015 ), 4jm4 ( Kong et al ., 2013 ) and 4zyk ( Gilman et al ., 2015 )) and V L λ ( I , red, PDBs: 4h8w ( Acharya et al ., 2014 ), 1aqk ( Faber et al ., 1998 ), 5d7s ( Eylenstein et al ., 2016 ), 5cck ( Lee et al ., 2015 )) clearly differ in the conserved environment of residue L95. Yellow cylinders, hydrogen bonds; yellow and orange structure, heavy chain; cyan residue, Gln L90; magenta, Pro L95; orange, Thr L97; blue, Phe L98; green, Val L97. (J) ‘ Sequence logo’ representation of the amino acids occurrence spatially neighboring residues of L95 in V L κ (top) and V L λ (bottom).
R Studio Version 14.2, supplied by RStudio, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/r studio version 14.2/product/RStudio
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
r studio version 14.2 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
edge r package version 3.14.0  (RStudio)
90
RStudio edge r package version 3.14.0
Structural differences between V L κ and V L λ were determined by <t>RandomForest.</t> (A) The most reliable classifiers for assigning the dataset of full light chain structures to the κ and λ isotypes are identified by the mean decrease gini (variables defined in ). (B) Unknown sequences can be reliably assigned to the κ and λ isotype according to the length of LFR4. (C) An overlay of representative Cα-traces displays how the exclusion (V L κ, green, 5ifa ( Huang et al ., 2004 )) or incorporation (V L λ, red, 3ujj ( Guan et al ., 2013 )) of L106A in LFR4 affects the structure. (D) V L λ structures exhibited a significantly lower energy penalty for peptide bonds in the cis-conformation if compared to V L κ structures. (E) The number of residues in LFR1 enables to distinguish between V L κ and V L λ sequences. (F) Representative structures of V L λ (3ujj ( Gorny et al ., 2011 ), red) and V L κ (5ifa ( Jardine et al ., 2016 ), green) illustrate structural differences in LFR1. V L κ structures frequently contain a cis-proline at position L8, stabilizing a fold that dramatically differs from V L λ structures that favor trans-prolines at positions L7 and L8. (G) ‘ Sequence logo’ representation of the amino acids identities in LFR1 of V L κ (top) and V L λ (bottom). (H, I) Representative structures of V L κ (H , green, PDBs: 3drq ( Julien et al ., 2008 ), 4ygv ( Schiele et al ., 2015 ), 4jm4 ( Kong et al ., 2013 ) and 4zyk ( Gilman et al ., 2015 )) and V L λ ( I , red, PDBs: 4h8w ( Acharya et al ., 2014 ), 1aqk ( Faber et al ., 1998 ), 5d7s ( Eylenstein et al ., 2016 ), 5cck ( Lee et al ., 2015 )) clearly differ in the conserved environment of residue L95. Yellow cylinders, hydrogen bonds; yellow and orange structure, heavy chain; cyan residue, Gln L90; magenta, Pro L95; orange, Thr L97; blue, Phe L98; green, Val L97. (J) ‘ Sequence logo’ representation of the amino acids occurrence spatially neighboring residues of L95 in V L κ (top) and V L λ (bottom).
Edge R Package Version 3.14.0, supplied by RStudio, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/edge r package version 3.14.0/product/RStudio
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
edge r package version 3.14.0 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
shiny version 0.14.2  (RStudio)
90
RStudio shiny version 0.14.2
Structural differences between V L κ and V L λ were determined by <t>RandomForest.</t> (A) The most reliable classifiers for assigning the dataset of full light chain structures to the κ and λ isotypes are identified by the mean decrease gini (variables defined in ). (B) Unknown sequences can be reliably assigned to the κ and λ isotype according to the length of LFR4. (C) An overlay of representative Cα-traces displays how the exclusion (V L κ, green, 5ifa ( Huang et al ., 2004 )) or incorporation (V L λ, red, 3ujj ( Guan et al ., 2013 )) of L106A in LFR4 affects the structure. (D) V L λ structures exhibited a significantly lower energy penalty for peptide bonds in the cis-conformation if compared to V L κ structures. (E) The number of residues in LFR1 enables to distinguish between V L κ and V L λ sequences. (F) Representative structures of V L λ (3ujj ( Gorny et al ., 2011 ), red) and V L κ (5ifa ( Jardine et al ., 2016 ), green) illustrate structural differences in LFR1. V L κ structures frequently contain a cis-proline at position L8, stabilizing a fold that dramatically differs from V L λ structures that favor trans-prolines at positions L7 and L8. (G) ‘ Sequence logo’ representation of the amino acids identities in LFR1 of V L κ (top) and V L λ (bottom). (H, I) Representative structures of V L κ (H , green, PDBs: 3drq ( Julien et al ., 2008 ), 4ygv ( Schiele et al ., 2015 ), 4jm4 ( Kong et al ., 2013 ) and 4zyk ( Gilman et al ., 2015 )) and V L λ ( I , red, PDBs: 4h8w ( Acharya et al ., 2014 ), 1aqk ( Faber et al ., 1998 ), 5d7s ( Eylenstein et al ., 2016 ), 5cck ( Lee et al ., 2015 )) clearly differ in the conserved environment of residue L95. Yellow cylinders, hydrogen bonds; yellow and orange structure, heavy chain; cyan residue, Gln L90; magenta, Pro L95; orange, Thr L97; blue, Phe L98; green, Val L97. (J) ‘ Sequence logo’ representation of the amino acids occurrence spatially neighboring residues of L95 in V L κ (top) and V L λ (bottom).
Shiny Version 0.14.2, supplied by RStudio, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/shiny version 0.14.2/product/RStudio
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
shiny version 0.14.2 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
regression analysis rstudio version 1.0.14  (RStudio)
90
RStudio regression analysis rstudio version 1.0.14
Structural differences between V L κ and V L λ were determined by <t>RandomForest.</t> (A) The most reliable classifiers for assigning the dataset of full light chain structures to the κ and λ isotypes are identified by the mean decrease gini (variables defined in ). (B) Unknown sequences can be reliably assigned to the κ and λ isotype according to the length of LFR4. (C) An overlay of representative Cα-traces displays how the exclusion (V L κ, green, 5ifa ( Huang et al ., 2004 )) or incorporation (V L λ, red, 3ujj ( Guan et al ., 2013 )) of L106A in LFR4 affects the structure. (D) V L λ structures exhibited a significantly lower energy penalty for peptide bonds in the cis-conformation if compared to V L κ structures. (E) The number of residues in LFR1 enables to distinguish between V L κ and V L λ sequences. (F) Representative structures of V L λ (3ujj ( Gorny et al ., 2011 ), red) and V L κ (5ifa ( Jardine et al ., 2016 ), green) illustrate structural differences in LFR1. V L κ structures frequently contain a cis-proline at position L8, stabilizing a fold that dramatically differs from V L λ structures that favor trans-prolines at positions L7 and L8. (G) ‘ Sequence logo’ representation of the amino acids identities in LFR1 of V L κ (top) and V L λ (bottom). (H, I) Representative structures of V L κ (H , green, PDBs: 3drq ( Julien et al ., 2008 ), 4ygv ( Schiele et al ., 2015 ), 4jm4 ( Kong et al ., 2013 ) and 4zyk ( Gilman et al ., 2015 )) and V L λ ( I , red, PDBs: 4h8w ( Acharya et al ., 2014 ), 1aqk ( Faber et al ., 1998 ), 5d7s ( Eylenstein et al ., 2016 ), 5cck ( Lee et al ., 2015 )) clearly differ in the conserved environment of residue L95. Yellow cylinders, hydrogen bonds; yellow and orange structure, heavy chain; cyan residue, Gln L90; magenta, Pro L95; orange, Thr L97; blue, Phe L98; green, Val L97. (J) ‘ Sequence logo’ representation of the amino acids occurrence spatially neighboring residues of L95 in V L κ (top) and V L λ (bottom).
Regression Analysis Rstudio Version 1.0.14, supplied by RStudio, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/regression analysis rstudio version 1.0.14/product/RStudio
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
regression analysis rstudio version 1.0.14 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
r software version 2.14.0  (RStudio)
90
RStudio r software version 2.14.0
Structural differences between V L κ and V L λ were determined by <t>RandomForest.</t> (A) The most reliable classifiers for assigning the dataset of full light chain structures to the κ and λ isotypes are identified by the mean decrease gini (variables defined in ). (B) Unknown sequences can be reliably assigned to the κ and λ isotype according to the length of LFR4. (C) An overlay of representative Cα-traces displays how the exclusion (V L κ, green, 5ifa ( Huang et al ., 2004 )) or incorporation (V L λ, red, 3ujj ( Guan et al ., 2013 )) of L106A in LFR4 affects the structure. (D) V L λ structures exhibited a significantly lower energy penalty for peptide bonds in the cis-conformation if compared to V L κ structures. (E) The number of residues in LFR1 enables to distinguish between V L κ and V L λ sequences. (F) Representative structures of V L λ (3ujj ( Gorny et al ., 2011 ), red) and V L κ (5ifa ( Jardine et al ., 2016 ), green) illustrate structural differences in LFR1. V L κ structures frequently contain a cis-proline at position L8, stabilizing a fold that dramatically differs from V L λ structures that favor trans-prolines at positions L7 and L8. (G) ‘ Sequence logo’ representation of the amino acids identities in LFR1 of V L κ (top) and V L λ (bottom). (H, I) Representative structures of V L κ (H , green, PDBs: 3drq ( Julien et al ., 2008 ), 4ygv ( Schiele et al ., 2015 ), 4jm4 ( Kong et al ., 2013 ) and 4zyk ( Gilman et al ., 2015 )) and V L λ ( I , red, PDBs: 4h8w ( Acharya et al ., 2014 ), 1aqk ( Faber et al ., 1998 ), 5d7s ( Eylenstein et al ., 2016 ), 5cck ( Lee et al ., 2015 )) clearly differ in the conserved environment of residue L95. Yellow cylinders, hydrogen bonds; yellow and orange structure, heavy chain; cyan residue, Gln L90; magenta, Pro L95; orange, Thr L97; blue, Phe L98; green, Val L97. (J) ‘ Sequence logo’ representation of the amino acids occurrence spatially neighboring residues of L95 in V L κ (top) and V L λ (bottom).
R Software Version 2.14.0, supplied by RStudio, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/r software version 2.14.0/product/RStudio
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
r software version 2.14.0 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
geoda version 1.14.0  (RStudio)
90
RStudio geoda version 1.14.0
Structural differences between V L κ and V L λ were determined by <t>RandomForest.</t> (A) The most reliable classifiers for assigning the dataset of full light chain structures to the κ and λ isotypes are identified by the mean decrease gini (variables defined in ). (B) Unknown sequences can be reliably assigned to the κ and λ isotype according to the length of LFR4. (C) An overlay of representative Cα-traces displays how the exclusion (V L κ, green, 5ifa ( Huang et al ., 2004 )) or incorporation (V L λ, red, 3ujj ( Guan et al ., 2013 )) of L106A in LFR4 affects the structure. (D) V L λ structures exhibited a significantly lower energy penalty for peptide bonds in the cis-conformation if compared to V L κ structures. (E) The number of residues in LFR1 enables to distinguish between V L κ and V L λ sequences. (F) Representative structures of V L λ (3ujj ( Gorny et al ., 2011 ), red) and V L κ (5ifa ( Jardine et al ., 2016 ), green) illustrate structural differences in LFR1. V L κ structures frequently contain a cis-proline at position L8, stabilizing a fold that dramatically differs from V L λ structures that favor trans-prolines at positions L7 and L8. (G) ‘ Sequence logo’ representation of the amino acids identities in LFR1 of V L κ (top) and V L λ (bottom). (H, I) Representative structures of V L κ (H , green, PDBs: 3drq ( Julien et al ., 2008 ), 4ygv ( Schiele et al ., 2015 ), 4jm4 ( Kong et al ., 2013 ) and 4zyk ( Gilman et al ., 2015 )) and V L λ ( I , red, PDBs: 4h8w ( Acharya et al ., 2014 ), 1aqk ( Faber et al ., 1998 ), 5d7s ( Eylenstein et al ., 2016 ), 5cck ( Lee et al ., 2015 )) clearly differ in the conserved environment of residue L95. Yellow cylinders, hydrogen bonds; yellow and orange structure, heavy chain; cyan residue, Gln L90; magenta, Pro L95; orange, Thr L97; blue, Phe L98; green, Val L97. (J) ‘ Sequence logo’ representation of the amino acids occurrence spatially neighboring residues of L95 in V L κ (top) and V L λ (bottom).
Geoda Version 1.14.0, supplied by RStudio, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/geoda version 1.14.0/product/RStudio
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
geoda version 1.14.0 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
programming language r version 2.14.1  (RStudio)
90
RStudio programming language r version 2.14.1
Structural differences between V L κ and V L λ were determined by <t>RandomForest.</t> (A) The most reliable classifiers for assigning the dataset of full light chain structures to the κ and λ isotypes are identified by the mean decrease gini (variables defined in ). (B) Unknown sequences can be reliably assigned to the κ and λ isotype according to the length of LFR4. (C) An overlay of representative Cα-traces displays how the exclusion (V L κ, green, 5ifa ( Huang et al ., 2004 )) or incorporation (V L λ, red, 3ujj ( Guan et al ., 2013 )) of L106A in LFR4 affects the structure. (D) V L λ structures exhibited a significantly lower energy penalty for peptide bonds in the cis-conformation if compared to V L κ structures. (E) The number of residues in LFR1 enables to distinguish between V L κ and V L λ sequences. (F) Representative structures of V L λ (3ujj ( Gorny et al ., 2011 ), red) and V L κ (5ifa ( Jardine et al ., 2016 ), green) illustrate structural differences in LFR1. V L κ structures frequently contain a cis-proline at position L8, stabilizing a fold that dramatically differs from V L λ structures that favor trans-prolines at positions L7 and L8. (G) ‘ Sequence logo’ representation of the amino acids identities in LFR1 of V L κ (top) and V L λ (bottom). (H, I) Representative structures of V L κ (H , green, PDBs: 3drq ( Julien et al ., 2008 ), 4ygv ( Schiele et al ., 2015 ), 4jm4 ( Kong et al ., 2013 ) and 4zyk ( Gilman et al ., 2015 )) and V L λ ( I , red, PDBs: 4h8w ( Acharya et al ., 2014 ), 1aqk ( Faber et al ., 1998 ), 5d7s ( Eylenstein et al ., 2016 ), 5cck ( Lee et al ., 2015 )) clearly differ in the conserved environment of residue L95. Yellow cylinders, hydrogen bonds; yellow and orange structure, heavy chain; cyan residue, Gln L90; magenta, Pro L95; orange, Thr L97; blue, Phe L98; green, Val L97. (J) ‘ Sequence logo’ representation of the amino acids occurrence spatially neighboring residues of L95 in V L κ (top) and V L λ (bottom).
Programming Language R Version 2.14.1, supplied by RStudio, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/programming language r version 2.14.1/product/RStudio
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
programming language r version 2.14.1 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
lavaan version 0.6–14  (RStudio)
90
RStudio lavaan version 0.6–14
Structural differences between V L κ and V L λ were determined by <t>RandomForest.</t> (A) The most reliable classifiers for assigning the dataset of full light chain structures to the κ and λ isotypes are identified by the mean decrease gini (variables defined in ). (B) Unknown sequences can be reliably assigned to the κ and λ isotype according to the length of LFR4. (C) An overlay of representative Cα-traces displays how the exclusion (V L κ, green, 5ifa ( Huang et al ., 2004 )) or incorporation (V L λ, red, 3ujj ( Guan et al ., 2013 )) of L106A in LFR4 affects the structure. (D) V L λ structures exhibited a significantly lower energy penalty for peptide bonds in the cis-conformation if compared to V L κ structures. (E) The number of residues in LFR1 enables to distinguish between V L κ and V L λ sequences. (F) Representative structures of V L λ (3ujj ( Gorny et al ., 2011 ), red) and V L κ (5ifa ( Jardine et al ., 2016 ), green) illustrate structural differences in LFR1. V L κ structures frequently contain a cis-proline at position L8, stabilizing a fold that dramatically differs from V L λ structures that favor trans-prolines at positions L7 and L8. (G) ‘ Sequence logo’ representation of the amino acids identities in LFR1 of V L κ (top) and V L λ (bottom). (H, I) Representative structures of V L κ (H , green, PDBs: 3drq ( Julien et al ., 2008 ), 4ygv ( Schiele et al ., 2015 ), 4jm4 ( Kong et al ., 2013 ) and 4zyk ( Gilman et al ., 2015 )) and V L λ ( I , red, PDBs: 4h8w ( Acharya et al ., 2014 ), 1aqk ( Faber et al ., 1998 ), 5d7s ( Eylenstein et al ., 2016 ), 5cck ( Lee et al ., 2015 )) clearly differ in the conserved environment of residue L95. Yellow cylinders, hydrogen bonds; yellow and orange structure, heavy chain; cyan residue, Gln L90; magenta, Pro L95; orange, Thr L97; blue, Phe L98; green, Val L97. (J) ‘ Sequence logo’ representation of the amino acids occurrence spatially neighboring residues of L95 in V L κ (top) and V L λ (bottom).
Lavaan Version 0.6–14, supplied by RStudio, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/lavaan version 0.6–14/product/RStudio
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
lavaan version 0.6–14 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
random forest version 4.6.14  (RStudio)
90
RStudio random forest version 4.6.14
Structural differences between V L κ and V L λ were determined by <t>RandomForest.</t> (A) The most reliable classifiers for assigning the dataset of full light chain structures to the κ and λ isotypes are identified by the mean decrease gini (variables defined in ). (B) Unknown sequences can be reliably assigned to the κ and λ isotype according to the length of LFR4. (C) An overlay of representative Cα-traces displays how the exclusion (V L κ, green, 5ifa ( Huang et al ., 2004 )) or incorporation (V L λ, red, 3ujj ( Guan et al ., 2013 )) of L106A in LFR4 affects the structure. (D) V L λ structures exhibited a significantly lower energy penalty for peptide bonds in the cis-conformation if compared to V L κ structures. (E) The number of residues in LFR1 enables to distinguish between V L κ and V L λ sequences. (F) Representative structures of V L λ (3ujj ( Gorny et al ., 2011 ), red) and V L κ (5ifa ( Jardine et al ., 2016 ), green) illustrate structural differences in LFR1. V L κ structures frequently contain a cis-proline at position L8, stabilizing a fold that dramatically differs from V L λ structures that favor trans-prolines at positions L7 and L8. (G) ‘ Sequence logo’ representation of the amino acids identities in LFR1 of V L κ (top) and V L λ (bottom). (H, I) Representative structures of V L κ (H , green, PDBs: 3drq ( Julien et al ., 2008 ), 4ygv ( Schiele et al ., 2015 ), 4jm4 ( Kong et al ., 2013 ) and 4zyk ( Gilman et al ., 2015 )) and V L λ ( I , red, PDBs: 4h8w ( Acharya et al ., 2014 ), 1aqk ( Faber et al ., 1998 ), 5d7s ( Eylenstein et al ., 2016 ), 5cck ( Lee et al ., 2015 )) clearly differ in the conserved environment of residue L95. Yellow cylinders, hydrogen bonds; yellow and orange structure, heavy chain; cyan residue, Gln L90; magenta, Pro L95; orange, Thr L97; blue, Phe L98; green, Val L97. (J) ‘ Sequence logo’ representation of the amino acids occurrence spatially neighboring residues of L95 in V L κ (top) and V L λ (bottom).
Random Forest Version 4.6.14, supplied by RStudio, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/random forest version 4.6.14/product/RStudio
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
random forest version 4.6.14 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
gnu r version 2.14  (RStudio)
90
RStudio gnu r version 2.14
Structural differences between V L κ and V L λ were determined by <t>RandomForest.</t> (A) The most reliable classifiers for assigning the dataset of full light chain structures to the κ and λ isotypes are identified by the mean decrease gini (variables defined in ). (B) Unknown sequences can be reliably assigned to the κ and λ isotype according to the length of LFR4. (C) An overlay of representative Cα-traces displays how the exclusion (V L κ, green, 5ifa ( Huang et al ., 2004 )) or incorporation (V L λ, red, 3ujj ( Guan et al ., 2013 )) of L106A in LFR4 affects the structure. (D) V L λ structures exhibited a significantly lower energy penalty for peptide bonds in the cis-conformation if compared to V L κ structures. (E) The number of residues in LFR1 enables to distinguish between V L κ and V L λ sequences. (F) Representative structures of V L λ (3ujj ( Gorny et al ., 2011 ), red) and V L κ (5ifa ( Jardine et al ., 2016 ), green) illustrate structural differences in LFR1. V L κ structures frequently contain a cis-proline at position L8, stabilizing a fold that dramatically differs from V L λ structures that favor trans-prolines at positions L7 and L8. (G) ‘ Sequence logo’ representation of the amino acids identities in LFR1 of V L κ (top) and V L λ (bottom). (H, I) Representative structures of V L κ (H , green, PDBs: 3drq ( Julien et al ., 2008 ), 4ygv ( Schiele et al ., 2015 ), 4jm4 ( Kong et al ., 2013 ) and 4zyk ( Gilman et al ., 2015 )) and V L λ ( I , red, PDBs: 4h8w ( Acharya et al ., 2014 ), 1aqk ( Faber et al ., 1998 ), 5d7s ( Eylenstein et al ., 2016 ), 5cck ( Lee et al ., 2015 )) clearly differ in the conserved environment of residue L95. Yellow cylinders, hydrogen bonds; yellow and orange structure, heavy chain; cyan residue, Gln L90; magenta, Pro L95; orange, Thr L97; blue, Phe L98; green, Val L97. (J) ‘ Sequence logo’ representation of the amino acids occurrence spatially neighboring residues of L95 in V L κ (top) and V L λ (bottom).
Gnu R Version 2.14, supplied by RStudio, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/gnu r version 2.14/product/RStudio
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
gnu r version 2.14 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
package version 1.0.14  (RStudio)
90
RStudio package version 1.0.14
Structural differences between V L κ and V L λ were determined by <t>RandomForest.</t> (A) The most reliable classifiers for assigning the dataset of full light chain structures to the κ and λ isotypes are identified by the mean decrease gini (variables defined in ). (B) Unknown sequences can be reliably assigned to the κ and λ isotype according to the length of LFR4. (C) An overlay of representative Cα-traces displays how the exclusion (V L κ, green, 5ifa ( Huang et al ., 2004 )) or incorporation (V L λ, red, 3ujj ( Guan et al ., 2013 )) of L106A in LFR4 affects the structure. (D) V L λ structures exhibited a significantly lower energy penalty for peptide bonds in the cis-conformation if compared to V L κ structures. (E) The number of residues in LFR1 enables to distinguish between V L κ and V L λ sequences. (F) Representative structures of V L λ (3ujj ( Gorny et al ., 2011 ), red) and V L κ (5ifa ( Jardine et al ., 2016 ), green) illustrate structural differences in LFR1. V L κ structures frequently contain a cis-proline at position L8, stabilizing a fold that dramatically differs from V L λ structures that favor trans-prolines at positions L7 and L8. (G) ‘ Sequence logo’ representation of the amino acids identities in LFR1 of V L κ (top) and V L λ (bottom). (H, I) Representative structures of V L κ (H , green, PDBs: 3drq ( Julien et al ., 2008 ), 4ygv ( Schiele et al ., 2015 ), 4jm4 ( Kong et al ., 2013 ) and 4zyk ( Gilman et al ., 2015 )) and V L λ ( I , red, PDBs: 4h8w ( Acharya et al ., 2014 ), 1aqk ( Faber et al ., 1998 ), 5d7s ( Eylenstein et al ., 2016 ), 5cck ( Lee et al ., 2015 )) clearly differ in the conserved environment of residue L95. Yellow cylinders, hydrogen bonds; yellow and orange structure, heavy chain; cyan residue, Gln L90; magenta, Pro L95; orange, Thr L97; blue, Phe L98; green, Val L97. (J) ‘ Sequence logo’ representation of the amino acids occurrence spatially neighboring residues of L95 in V L κ (top) and V L λ (bottom).
Package Version 1.0.14, supplied by RStudio, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/package version 1.0.14/product/RStudio
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
package version 1.0.14 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

Image Search Results


Structural differences between V L κ and V L λ were determined by RandomForest. (A) The most reliable classifiers for assigning the dataset of full light chain structures to the κ and λ isotypes are identified by the mean decrease gini (variables defined in ). (B) Unknown sequences can be reliably assigned to the κ and λ isotype according to the length of LFR4. (C) An overlay of representative Cα-traces displays how the exclusion (V L κ, green, 5ifa ( Huang et al ., 2004 )) or incorporation (V L λ, red, 3ujj ( Guan et al ., 2013 )) of L106A in LFR4 affects the structure. (D) V L λ structures exhibited a significantly lower energy penalty for peptide bonds in the cis-conformation if compared to V L κ structures. (E) The number of residues in LFR1 enables to distinguish between V L κ and V L λ sequences. (F) Representative structures of V L λ (3ujj ( Gorny et al ., 2011 ), red) and V L κ (5ifa ( Jardine et al ., 2016 ), green) illustrate structural differences in LFR1. V L κ structures frequently contain a cis-proline at position L8, stabilizing a fold that dramatically differs from V L λ structures that favor trans-prolines at positions L7 and L8. (G) ‘ Sequence logo’ representation of the amino acids identities in LFR1 of V L κ (top) and V L λ (bottom). (H, I) Representative structures of V L κ (H , green, PDBs: 3drq ( Julien et al ., 2008 ), 4ygv ( Schiele et al ., 2015 ), 4jm4 ( Kong et al ., 2013 ) and 4zyk ( Gilman et al ., 2015 )) and V L λ ( I , red, PDBs: 4h8w ( Acharya et al ., 2014 ), 1aqk ( Faber et al ., 1998 ), 5d7s ( Eylenstein et al ., 2016 ), 5cck ( Lee et al ., 2015 )) clearly differ in the conserved environment of residue L95. Yellow cylinders, hydrogen bonds; yellow and orange structure, heavy chain; cyan residue, Gln L90; magenta, Pro L95; orange, Thr L97; blue, Phe L98; green, Val L97. (J) ‘ Sequence logo’ representation of the amino acids occurrence spatially neighboring residues of L95 in V L κ (top) and V L λ (bottom).

Journal: Protein Engineering, Design and Selection

Article Title: Adaption of human antibody λ and κ light chain architectures to CDR repertoires

doi: 10.1093/protein/gzz012

Figure Lengend Snippet: Structural differences between V L κ and V L λ were determined by RandomForest. (A) The most reliable classifiers for assigning the dataset of full light chain structures to the κ and λ isotypes are identified by the mean decrease gini (variables defined in ). (B) Unknown sequences can be reliably assigned to the κ and λ isotype according to the length of LFR4. (C) An overlay of representative Cα-traces displays how the exclusion (V L κ, green, 5ifa ( Huang et al ., 2004 )) or incorporation (V L λ, red, 3ujj ( Guan et al ., 2013 )) of L106A in LFR4 affects the structure. (D) V L λ structures exhibited a significantly lower energy penalty for peptide bonds in the cis-conformation if compared to V L κ structures. (E) The number of residues in LFR1 enables to distinguish between V L κ and V L λ sequences. (F) Representative structures of V L λ (3ujj ( Gorny et al ., 2011 ), red) and V L κ (5ifa ( Jardine et al ., 2016 ), green) illustrate structural differences in LFR1. V L κ structures frequently contain a cis-proline at position L8, stabilizing a fold that dramatically differs from V L λ structures that favor trans-prolines at positions L7 and L8. (G) ‘ Sequence logo’ representation of the amino acids identities in LFR1 of V L κ (top) and V L λ (bottom). (H, I) Representative structures of V L κ (H , green, PDBs: 3drq ( Julien et al ., 2008 ), 4ygv ( Schiele et al ., 2015 ), 4jm4 ( Kong et al ., 2013 ) and 4zyk ( Gilman et al ., 2015 )) and V L λ ( I , red, PDBs: 4h8w ( Acharya et al ., 2014 ), 1aqk ( Faber et al ., 1998 ), 5d7s ( Eylenstein et al ., 2016 ), 5cck ( Lee et al ., 2015 )) clearly differ in the conserved environment of residue L95. Yellow cylinders, hydrogen bonds; yellow and orange structure, heavy chain; cyan residue, Gln L90; magenta, Pro L95; orange, Thr L97; blue, Phe L98; green, Val L97. (J) ‘ Sequence logo’ representation of the amino acids occurrence spatially neighboring residues of L95 in V L κ (top) and V L λ (bottom).

Article Snippet: R-studio was used to perform the RandomForest analyses (randomForest R-package version 4.6-14) ( ).

Techniques: Sequencing, Residue